Navegando por Palavras-chave "Editorial Policies"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
- ItemAcesso aberto (Open Access)A escolha do periódico(Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia, 2005-01-01) Nahas, Fabio Xerfan [UNIFESP]; Ferreira, Lydia Masako [UNIFESP]; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)On a submission process, the choice of the journal is a fact that may lead to the acceptance or rejection of the paper. Some facts must be considered when a journal is chosen. The journal focus, the study type, the scientific value of the study, and the innovation that the study will bring to the medical field are issues that must be considered when submitting a paper. The data base index and the impact factor of the journal are determinant facts that increase the chance of citation of the paper. The editorial evaluation process of the journals is described and reviewed.
- ItemAcesso aberto (Open Access)Revistas brasileiras publicadoras de artigos científicos em cirurgia. III: análise das instruções aos autores baseada na estrutura dos requisitos de Vancouver(Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia, 2007-12-01) Pellizzon, Rosely de Fátima [UNIFESP]; Montero, Edna Frasson de Souza [UNIFESP]; Población, Dinah Aguiar; Monteiro, Rosangela; Castro, Regina Célia Figueiredo; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP); NCCC; Universidade de São Paulo (USP); Núcleo de Comunicação Científica em Cirurgia; Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da SaúdePURPOSE: To analyze the instructions for authors of Brazilian scientific journals in the surgery field, in order to describe the present situation, as well to make recommendations for editors and authors. METHODS: Instruction for authors of 20 journals were analyzed and classified following Vancouver requirements. Instructions were taken from SciELO, from the journals homepage, or from the last printed issue available in BIREME s collection. Results were descriptively analyzed, considering the frequency of each variable. RESULTS: 75% of the journals recommended ICMJE Uniform Requirements, although not always the newest version was indicated; 90% of the journals mentioned ethical research principles, 80% the peer-review process and 70% the conflict of interests and the author rights transfer agreement. Foreign languages frequently accepted were English (80%) and Spanish (30%). All journals publish original papers, followed by reviews (90%), case reports (80%), letters to the editor (70%), and clinical updates or continuing education (55%). The nomenclature for the sections varied among journals. CONCLUSION: Even though publishing freedom and independence of each publisher must be respected, there are internationally accepted criteria that must be observed. The current trends, towards the prioritization of open access electronic journals, will lead to important changes in the process of publishing scientific journals.