Navegando por Palavras-chave "Induction therapy"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
- ItemAcesso aberto (Open Access)Acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients: experience of a single center(Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, 2003-06-01) Rodrigues, Celso Arrais [UNIFESP]; Chauffaille, Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari [UNIFESP]; Pelloso, L.a.f. [UNIFESP]; Ghaname, F.s. [UNIFESP]; Kerbauy, Daniela Márcia Bahia [UNIFESP]; Campos, M.g.v. [UNIFESP]; Yamamoto, Mihoko [UNIFESP]; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease predominantly of older adults. Treatment of AML in the elderly is complicated not only by comorbidities but also by the high prevalence of poor prognosis markers. Thirty-one consecutive unselected patients with AML older than 60 years (representing 33% of all AML cases diagnosed at our institution during the same period) were followed over a period of 5 years (1997-2002). A high incidence of AML with multilineage dysplasia (45%) and no favorable cytogenetic abnormalities but 62% intermediate and 38% unfavorable karyotypes were found. Sixteen patients (52%) were selected for induction of intensive cytotoxic treatment and complete remission was achieved only by some of these intensively treated patients (7 of 16). Of these, 3 remained alive without disease (median: 11 months), 1 patient died shortly after complete remission, and 3 patients relapsed and died from refractory disease. Only 1 patient that was refractory to intensive cytotoxic treatment remained alive with disease under supportive care. Fifteen patients (48%) were managed with palliative/supportive care: 7 received palliative treatment and supportive care, 8 received supportive care only, and 4 patients remained alive with disease under supportive care (median: 9 months). Mortality rate was 74% and overall survival at two years was 12%. To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous report regarding elderly patients with AML in Brazilian subsets. The present data are similar to previously reported studies showing that elderly AML patients are not only older but also biologically distinct from younger AML patients, particularly in terms of the high incidence of poor prognostic karyotypes and resistance to therapy.
- ItemSomente MetadadadosBasiliximab induction in patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens(Springer, 2013-04-01) Sandes-Freitas, Taina Veras de [UNIFESP]; Felipe, Claudia Rosso [UNIFESP]; Franco, Marcello Fabiano de [UNIFESP]; Tedesco-Silva, Helio [UNIFESP]; Medina-Pestana, Jose Osmar [UNIFESP]; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)The use of basiliximab induction increased significantly in recent years based on its superior efficacy and excellent safety profile demonstrated in studies with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. However, its clinical utility in patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens is still uncertain.We retrospectively reviewed data of 366 low immunological risk recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants. of them, 134 received basiliximab and tacrolimus (TAC-IL2-RA), 100 received basiliximab and delayed tacrolimus(dTAC-IL2-RA), and 132 patients received tacrolimus without basiliximab(TAC-No). the endpoints were the incidence of acute rejection, graft function, and patient and graft survivals at 1 year.The incidence of acute rejection was higher in dTAC-IL2-RA compared to TAC-IL-2RA and TAC-No Groups (33 vs.14.9 vs. 14.3 %, p < 0.001). Inferior creatinine clearance was observed in dTAC-IL2-RA Group compared to TAC-IL2-RA and TAC-No Groups at months 1 (41.6 vs. 49.9 vs. 44.8 mL/min, p = 0.004), 3 (49.8 vs. 57.2 vs. 53.5 mL/min, p = 0.017), and 6 (53.1 vs. 61.8 vs. 57.0 mL/min, p = 0.001). Patients who received basiliximab (TAC-IL2-RA and dTAC-IL2-RA Groups) had lower incidence of posttransplant diabetes (24 vs.18 vs. 39.3 %, p = 0.009). Patient and graft survivals were similar among the groups.In low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, the use of basiliximab induction was not associated with lower rejection rates and did not allow delayed tacrolimus introduction.