Image analysis software versus direct anthropometry for breast measurements

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorEspírito Santo, Paulo Rogério Quieregatto do [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorHochman, Bernardo [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorFurtado, Fabianne [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Aline Fernanda Perez
dc.contributor.authorSabino Neto, Miguel [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Lydia Masako [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-14T13:47:21Z
dc.date.available2015-06-14T13:47:21Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-01
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE:To compare breast measurements performed using the software packages ImageTool(r), AutoCAD(r) and Adobe Photoshop(r) with direct anthropometric measurements.METHODS:Points were marked on the breasts and arms of 40 volunteer women aged between 18 and 60 years. When connecting the points, seven linear segments and one angular measurement on each half of the body, and one medial segment common to both body halves were defined. The volunteers were photographed in a standardized manner. Photogrammetric measurements were performed by three independent observers using the three software packages and compared to direct anthropometric measurements made with calipers and a protractor.RESULTS:Measurements obtained with AutoCAD(r) were the most reproducible and those made with ImageTool(r) were the most similar to direct anthropometry, while measurements with Adobe Photoshop(r) showed the largest differences. Except for angular measurements, significant differences were found between measurements of line segments made using the three software packages and those obtained by direct anthropometry.CONCLUSION:AutoCAD(r) provided the highest precision and intermediate accuracy; ImageTool(r) had the highest accuracy and lowest precision; and Adobe Photoshop(r) showed intermediate precision and the worst accuracy among the three software packages.en
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Department of Surgery
dc.description.affiliationUNIFESP
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUNIFESP, Department of Surgery
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUNIFESP
dc.description.sourceSciELO
dc.format.extent688-695
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8650201400160010
dc.identifier.citationActa Cirurgica Brasileira. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia, v. 29, n. 10, p. 688-695, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S0102-8650201400160010
dc.identifier.fileS0102-86502014001000688.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0102-8650
dc.identifier.scieloS0102-86502014001000688
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8638
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000343982100010
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
dc.relation.ispartofActa Cirurgica Brasileira
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPhotogrammetryen
dc.subjectAnthropometryen
dc.subjectSoftwareen
dc.subjectBreasten
dc.subjectBody Weights and Measuresen
dc.titleImage analysis software versus direct anthropometry for breast measurementsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S0102-86502014001000688.pdf
Tamanho:
440.38 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Baixar
Coleções
EPM - Artigos