Navegando por Palavras-chave "Violência Por Parceiro Íntimo"
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
- ItemSomente MetadadadosViolência por parceiro íntimo e resiliência em mulheres usuárias da atenção primária em saúde em município da Amazônia ocidental brasileira(Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 2020-04-30) Valenzuela, Vivian Victoria Vivanco [UNIFESP]; Vianna, Lucila Amaral Carneiro [UNIFESP]; Universidade Federal de São PauloObjectives: to verify the prevalence of violence against women perpetrated by an intimate partner; to measure resilience in women; to relate resilience to the type of violence perpetrated; to identify the impulse and inhibitory motivations for seeking help; to relate the impulse/inhibitory motivations for the search for help with the type of violence perpetrated. Method: epidemiological study with cross – sectional design and analytical approach, conducted with 291 women between 18 and 59 years old, between April and July 2018. Results: The prevalence of intimate partner violence in the last 1 months was 58.8% (n=171). The resilience measured by the score showed that 50.9 per cent of the women had average resilience and 49.1 per cent low resilience, none of the participants obtained a score that was high resilience. The Factor Resilience Scale revealed that Factor I concentrates most participants (76.1 per cent), showing that they have their psychosocial adaptation aimed at solving actions and values, using strategies such as bringing plans to the end , being determined , find reasons to laugh and deal with problems in one way or another. The perpetration of physical violence negatively influences the development of Factor III of resilience (p=0.023), these women have less self-confidence and ability to adapt psychosocial situations, the adverse situations are dependent on third parties and have ineffectiveness to deal with various things at the same time. The impulse motivations for seeking help, 32.7 per cent expressed that they had already exhausted all the possibilities to maintain the relationship and 30 per cent believe that the aggressor will not change. The inhibitory motivations for 57.3 per cent is shame and in 54 per cent fear of the aggressor. Psychological violence negatively influenced the woman to decide to seek help (p <0.001), physical and sexual violence influenced the woman to decide to break through the cycle of violence and seek help (p<0.001). Conclusion: The higher prevalence of violence against women by an intimate partner was psychological, followed by physical and sexual. The resilience measured by score showed a predominance of average resilience. The assessment of resilience by factors showed a predominance of women with resiliente attitudes of Factor I to resolve actions and values. Physical violence by an intimate partner has negatively reverberated on resilience. The impulse/inhibitory motivations for seeking help were internal, a highly significant relationship was found between motivations and type of violence.