Pesquisar com o pesquisar itinerário entre afetos, éticas e políticas
Data
2022-08-05
Autores
Sanda, Gabriel Akira 
Orientadores
Henz, Alexandre de Oliveira
Tipo
Trabalho de conclusão de curso
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Resumo
Este escrito analisa éticas, políticas e afetos implicados com os gestos de pesquisa através de conversas com pesquisadores, inferências e problematizações. Uma das hipóteses é que o senso comum tende a tomar os gestos de pesquisa como guiados pela consciência, a racionalidade e pelas ideias de melhoramento e descoberta. Com os problemas produzidos e o campo de análise emergiram outras camadas ético-afetivo-políticas, mesmo que apenas tangencialmente referidas nas conversas e que foram ganhando força com os desdobramentos da investigação. Um dos movimentos deste escrito foi a discussão sobre como esta pesquisa acerca do pesquisar foi desdobrada, com interrupções no processo de escrita e tensões com a chamada escolha do tema de investigação etc. Ao longo do estudo foram abordadas questões como a análise da implicação, a questão das generalidades e singularidades, os eventos disparadores, a noção de perspectivismo e interpretação (o que podemos aprender com a pesquisa com animais), a ideia de pesquisa como caixa de ferramentas e utilitarismo, e também a questão da falha, do vazio e do disfuncionamento. Essas linhagens de problemas foram um tateamento inicial, fragmentário, errático, pequeno arrastão e exploração de forças que parecem marcar certas pesquisas e pesquisadores. Um itinerário que tentou jogar com mais elementos, inquietações e processos em mim que raramente receberam uma atenção menos cansada e podem interferir nos ditos resultados e análises imperceptivelmente
This writing examines ethics, politics, and affects implicated with research gestures through conversations with researchers, inferences, and problematizations. One hypothesis is that common sense tends to take research gestures as guided by consciousness, rationality, and ideas of improvement and discovery. With the problems produced and the field of analysis, other ethical-affective-political layers emerged, even if only tangentially mentioned in the conversations and which gained strength as the research unfolded. One of the movements of this writing was the discussion about how this research about researching unfolded, with interruptions in the writing process and tensions with the so-called choice of research topic, etc. Throughout the study issues such as the analysis of implication, the question of generalities and singularities, trigger events, the notion of perspectivism and interpretation (what we can learn from animal research), the idea of research as a toolbox and utilitarianism, and also the question of failure, emptiness, and dysfunction were addressed. These strains of problems were an initial, fragmentary, erratic groping, little trawling and exploration of forces that seem to mark certain research and researchers. An itinerary that tried to play with more elements, restlessness and processes in me that rarely received a less tired attention and may interfere in the said results and analysis imperceptibly
This writing examines ethics, politics, and affects implicated with research gestures through conversations with researchers, inferences, and problematizations. One hypothesis is that common sense tends to take research gestures as guided by consciousness, rationality, and ideas of improvement and discovery. With the problems produced and the field of analysis, other ethical-affective-political layers emerged, even if only tangentially mentioned in the conversations and which gained strength as the research unfolded. One of the movements of this writing was the discussion about how this research about researching unfolded, with interruptions in the writing process and tensions with the so-called choice of research topic, etc. Throughout the study issues such as the analysis of implication, the question of generalities and singularities, trigger events, the notion of perspectivism and interpretation (what we can learn from animal research), the idea of research as a toolbox and utilitarianism, and also the question of failure, emptiness, and dysfunction were addressed. These strains of problems were an initial, fragmentary, erratic groping, little trawling and exploration of forces that seem to mark certain research and researchers. An itinerary that tried to play with more elements, restlessness and processes in me that rarely received a less tired attention and may interfere in the said results and analysis imperceptibly
Descrição
Citação
SANDA, Gabriel Akira. Pesquisar com o pesquisar itinerário entre afetos, éticas e políticas. 2022. 36 f. Trabalho de conclusão de curso (Graduação em Psicologia) - Instituto de Saúde e Sociedade, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, 2022.