Software gráfico e antropometria direta em medidas de mama
Data
2013
Autores
Espírito Santo, Paulo Rogério Quieregatto do 
Orientadores
Rzeszetkowski, , Bernardo Hochman
Tipo
Dissertação de mestrado
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Resumo
A necessidade crescente de obter um instrumento que possibilite uma correta e precisa mensuracao das mamas gerou questionamentos sobre qual o melhor metodo para essa medicao. Na pratica clinica e rotineiramente utilizada a antropometria direta, porem trata-se de um metodo que sofre muitas variacoes, tanto na ferramenta de mensuracao (fita metrica, regua), quanto no tempo dispendido. Aliados a documentacao fotografica, necessita-se de instrumentos digitais que possibilitem realizar as mensuracoes de forma objetiva. Objetivo: Comparar tres softwares graficos na obtencao de medidas de mamas. Metodos: Em 40 voluntarias do genero feminino, com idades entre 18 e 60 anos, foram demarcados pontos sobre a regiao mamaria e bracos. A uniao destes pontos em cada hemicorpo formou 8 segmentos lineares e 1 angular, totalizando 80 hemicorpos avaliados, e 1 segmento mediano comum n=40. As voluntarias foram mensuradas por antropometria direta e fotografadas de maneira padronizada, e a seguir avaliadas por tres observadores, com auxilio dos softwares Image Tool®, AutoCAD 2008® e Adobe Photoshop®. Resultados: O AutoCAD® revelou ser o software com maior reprodutibilidade. O Image Tool® apresentou valores mais proximos da antropometria direta e o Photoshop® os mais distantes. Com excessao a medida do angulo, todos os outros segmentos apresentaram, em media, diferencas quando realizada a comparacao dos softwares com a antropometria direta (p<0,005). Conclusao: O AutoCAD® foi o software que apresentou melhor precisao, Image Tool® apresentou medidas mais proximas da antropometria direta, porem foi o menos preciso e Photoshop® apresentou precisao intermediaria entre os tres softwares estudados e pior acuracia
Introduction: The increasing need for tools that enable a correct assessment for breast measurement, generated a series of questions about which the best tool to be used. In clinical practice is routinely used to direct anthropometry, but proved to be a method that undergoes many changes, both in the tool used to measure (measuring tape, ruler), as the time spent in this measurement. Allied to the photographic documentation, its necessary tools that allow us to realize digital measurements in an objective form. Objective: Compare three diferents software in measures of breasts. Methods: In 40 female volunteers aged between 18 and 60 years were marked points on the breast and arms. The union of these points in each hemibody, formed 8 linear segment and 1 angular, totaling N=80 hemicorpos evaluated, and 1 common segment with n=40. The volunteers were measures with direct antrophometry and photographed in a standardized way. These photographs were measured for 03 different evaluators, inter and intra evaluators with the help of software Image Tool®, AutoCAD 2008® and Adobe Photoshop®. Results: AutoCAD® software to be revealed with higher reproducibility. The Image Tool® showed values closer to the direct anthropometry and the most distant was Photoshop®. In exception, the measure of the angle, all the others segments exhibited, on average, differences when performed to compare the software with direct anthropometry (p<0,005). Conclusion: AutoCAD® was the software that showed the best accuracy, Image Tool® presented measures nearest the direct anthropometry, but was less accurate and Photoshop® showed intermediate precision among the 3 studied software and the worst accuracy.
Introduction: The increasing need for tools that enable a correct assessment for breast measurement, generated a series of questions about which the best tool to be used. In clinical practice is routinely used to direct anthropometry, but proved to be a method that undergoes many changes, both in the tool used to measure (measuring tape, ruler), as the time spent in this measurement. Allied to the photographic documentation, its necessary tools that allow us to realize digital measurements in an objective form. Objective: Compare three diferents software in measures of breasts. Methods: In 40 female volunteers aged between 18 and 60 years were marked points on the breast and arms. The union of these points in each hemibody, formed 8 linear segment and 1 angular, totaling N=80 hemicorpos evaluated, and 1 common segment with n=40. The volunteers were measures with direct antrophometry and photographed in a standardized way. These photographs were measured for 03 different evaluators, inter and intra evaluators with the help of software Image Tool®, AutoCAD 2008® and Adobe Photoshop®. Results: AutoCAD® software to be revealed with higher reproducibility. The Image Tool® showed values closer to the direct anthropometry and the most distant was Photoshop®. In exception, the measure of the angle, all the others segments exhibited, on average, differences when performed to compare the software with direct anthropometry (p<0,005). Conclusion: AutoCAD® was the software that showed the best accuracy, Image Tool® presented measures nearest the direct anthropometry, but was less accurate and Photoshop® showed intermediate precision among the 3 studied software and the worst accuracy.
Descrição
Citação
ESPÍRITO SANTO, Paulo Rogério Quieregatto do. Software gráfico e antropometria direta em medidas de mama. 2013. 95 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Cirurgia Translacional) - Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2013.